Monday, 21 November 2011

Scottish 640 cow unit


Here are some photos of a new 640 cow unit in North Scotland which we worked
on with BHC Ltd www.bhc.ltd.uk

This has been a very successful build with detailed planning and
a very happy client, with a very nice new dairy unit.



These are all 5m head to head cubicles with post mounted C50 cubicles on sand beds.
We have used the MoovApillow as brisket barriers throughout.



Friday, 21 October 2011

Recent installation - 270 cow building

Here is a UK installation of 270 post Mounted C50 cubicles, complete with
Pasture Mat mattresses, Premium Pad foam and MoovApillows.

These are installed on 5m double rows and 2.75m single rows.





ZigZag rubber


New to our product range for 2011 is our ZigZag Rubber Belting.

ZigZag rubber belting is a new product designed for dairy housing floors. This is a 20mm rubber with heavy steel cables throughout. This means it will not stretch and hugs the floor.



Benefits of ZigZag rubber belting:
  • Major Reduction in foot and leg lesions and soreness
  • Reduces Fatigue from standing on concrete
  • Increases cow performance and longevity
  • Used at the feed barrier, cows will spend more time eating, resulting in higher milk production
  • Reduced hoof trimming and doctoring



Pictures of a recent installation in Shropshire, UK:






Tuesday, 30 August 2011

Have you thought about lighting lately?



Wilson Agriculture are proud to announce our new lighting system. We can now offer a specialist light designed for the dairy building.

We have called this AgriLux and are offering customer full lux plans and calculations for your housing.

How lighting effects dairy cow housing

Key points:


According to research, optimum photoperiod will increase milk yield by 6-10% on average

  • Eventually, cows increase feed intake to support the risen milk yield.
  • No effect on protein or solids content while only a very limited decrease in fat content.
  • The increase in milk yield amply compensates the effects on fat and feed intake.
Why is there an effect?

Light reception occurs in the eyes retina. Light inhibits an enzyme used in melatonin synthesis in the pineal gland. Therefore, as photoperiod increases, the duration of high levels of melatonin in the blood decreases. Melatonin concentration in the blood influences the concentration of some hormones in the blood, for example, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). Scientists believe changes in the concentration of IGF-1 play a role in the effect of photoperiod on milk production, as IGF-1 has been shown to increase milk yield.


Why is Wilson Agriculture concerned with this?

· The use of light is cost-effective and has a very short pay-back time.

· Very simple to carry out.

· No extra labor required.

· Improved production and therefore margins on the units we work with.

Requirements for lighting:

For milking cows, calves and heifers

  • 16 hour long day photo period; 150-200
  • lx at the eye level of the cow
  • 8 hour of uninterrupted darkness means less than 5 lx* at the eye level of the cow

Dry period

  • 16 hours long at less than 5 lx*.
  • 8 hours of 150-200 lx

[this will reset the long-day photo period and improve the immunity system]


*5lx means that you can still see a printed text.

Red night lights may be used to facilitate cow movement and observation during darkness. The intensity of red light has no (or only minor) effects on the cows’ perception of darkness, and thus melatonin secretion.

There should be no brighter lights in any part of the barn and cows need 2-4 weeks on average to adjust.


Please contact us for full information and plans like this:



Tuesday, 9 August 2011

Ventilation in Dairy Buildings

This article was published in Farmers Weekly back in October 2010. Now is the time to consider ventilation so take a look and let Wilson Agriculture help you get ready for this winter:


Many farmers have the potential to reduce mastitis incidence by tackling ventilation in existing cattle buildings, according to Jamie Robertson, Livestock Management Systems. "Ventilation can directly influence the survival rates of E coli and Strep uberis. For example, when bacteria is aerosolised - as with airflow across a straw bed or cubicle - loss of water molecules by evaporation may cause loss of microbial activity."

Fresh air also influences survival rates, with E coli demonstrating a 97% mortality rate after being exposed to fresh air for 90 minutes.

However, according to Mr Robertson, half of all buildings are inadequately ventilated for the animals housed in them. "People often emphasise nutrition and stocking rate in dry cow sheds, but too often I see these animals housed in grotty buildings.

"Problems are rarely a result of inappropriate stocking density, but more because of insufficient removal of vast quantities of heat and moisture," he said.

When ventilation is not up to scratch, moisture is unable to escape, landing on beds and creating an ideal environment for mastitis causing bacteria.

"We need to get the environment working against pathogens and for animals. A common misconception is that, because a building has some vents in the roof, it will ventilate adequately. But a building with only 50% of the required outlet area will only provide ventilation for 50% of stock housed.

"When air speed drops to calm, the only way fresh air can enter the building is when air leaves the building. With inadequate outlets, there will be an increase in heat and moisture."

And Mr Robertson said that any opposition to putting holes in the roof is misplaced as concerns over water entering the building can be managed by using a covered open ridge. Most rain ingress will also be prevented by the warm air leaving the building.

"Ventilation and stack effect requires a basic matching of inlet and outlet areas to be able to work to maximum efficiency. The relationship between inlet and outlet areas is building specific. But at minimum, an inlet to outlet ratio of 2:1 and typically 4:1 is recommended

Friday, 1 July 2011

Gold Cup winners open Day

Wilson Agriculture were proud to attend the RABDF Gold Cup winners open day on Wednesday 29th June. This was held at Kingspool Farm, Iron Acton, Bristol.

Congratulations to Chris and Mike King and their team.



We are please to supply all the cubicles and self locking feed barriers for this award winning unit.




Thursday, 16 June 2011

Glastonbury founder still a bona fide farmer


Great to see an article from the Farmers Weekly about our customer, Michael Eavis. He hosts the Glastonbury pop festival on his farm in Somerset, UK, and has a very nice cubicle building.


"Michael Eavis offered a glimpse into what it's like juggling life as a dairy farmer and host of the world's biggest music festival this week.


Talking to a paying audience on London's Southbank on Tuesday, the Somerset farmer (and Farmers Weekly subscriber) described how the festival has to be meticulously planned around his dairy herd.

Four weeks before 140,000 festival-goers descend on the 364ha (900-acre) site, his cows are brought into their winter housing - dubbed the "Mootel" - for the duration of the festival. Moving them early, Mr Eavis explained, is a necessary precaution to minimise the risk of E coli."


Here are some pictures of his Mootel:







Wednesday, 25 May 2011

Recent installation

This is a recent installation in Northern Ireland.
This unit has be set up for two milk robots.
It uses our floor mounted C50 cubicles, Pasture Mat mattresses
with Premium Pad and also the moovApillow.



Tuesday, 24 May 2011

Wilson Agriculture were pleased to be invited to talk at the Robotic Planning seminars last week. There are more planned in the future and details can be found at: www.healthycows.co.uk

Here is a report from the Farmers Guardian:

May 20, 2011

This meant allowing one square meter per 1,000 litres per year, according to Ivor Davey from Wilson Agriculture, who said this equated to 8-8.5 square meters per cow for an average herd, and 10 square meters for a herd giving 10,000 litres.

Also advising a minimum 4.5m distance to the feed barrier and 3m for other passages, he said sufficient cross-overs were essential as exit routes and 5m should be left between the robots and the closest cubicle.

“Cows should also be able to see the robot and will visit it more if they can, so high walls and very long buildings – of more than 40m – should be avoided,” he said.

Planning robots within existing buildings was a compromise that often had to be made but could offer considerable savings.

First design

Any investment, however, should be made as part of a 10 or 15 year plan, so proposed expansion could be built into the first design.

An example development he cited which allowed 10 square meters per cow had cost £1,250 per cow place, around £200 more than a seven square meter per cow unit.


Open Panel discussion with five milk robot manufacturers:


Blog Archive

Show/Hide Navigation